方法论: 提问还是搜索?

StackOverflow突破10k,

抛一个问题, 提问还是搜索?
答案: 只提问不搜索!

原因如下:

  1. 提问的过程, 也是梳理思路的过程, 往往问题还没写完, 答案便有了. 遇事便搜索, 有碍于良好思维习惯的养成;
  2. 搜索时, 注意力比较容易被操纵, 原本只是简单的问题, 过程中却被野花野草所吸引, 浪费大量时间;
  3. 提问能够钓到在当前知识水平与认知水平之上的解答, 更进一步可以裁判不同高手的答案; 而去搜索往往使用局限在当下的水平.
  4. 大部分问题, 并非直接挡住当前去路, 略过之后, 完全可以继续做事; 因此可以将问题抛出去;
  5. 提问更高效, 一个上午遇到5个问题, 全部提出来; 11:30的时候, 收割到4个答案, 只投入时间解决最后一个问题;

提问的心态:

  1. 本来就占用别人时间, 所以没脸没皮, 不要在乎难听的话与个人面子;

回答的心态:

  1. 作为个人的查漏补缺, 并且只回答自己感兴趣的问题, 这一条也可以反过来作为提问者的心态.

本文为项目"步步为营, 零秒精通Emacs"的Appedix A: Ask and Harvest Answers.

I agree with most of your ideas:

1,2,3,4,5.

But last one, I have my idea:

I actually want to learn this book. I want to find a way to commmunicate with the people who care about this idea.

For me, I use Emacs, it is trivial to write some elisp code to do such function, .e.g. write a org-mode extension.

I will study this book intensively, because in most of the world, people do not understand what I mean.

what is 10k?

what does it mean?

k means thousands.

1赞

oh, it looks like Action is very popular on st** over* site.

Thanks for inspiration. I start to compile such a list when I am reading.

Really appreciate it.

@Action

I recently am thinking about the learing. My teacher_, Richard P. Feynman said:

So, I think the best way to learn is similar to teach:

you and I discusses the ideas, thinking about the things ( e.g., how to learn physics ), and talk about the things. Just like posting ideas here.

Compare the condition Feymnan has, I think the best way we could to take action is similar to what you’ve presented.

I think what Feyman said about “impossible” to learn, is about to reduce the effort to think.

I think what Feyman said about “direct” individual relationship is a condition that the asker and answer, both of them, are thinking asking question and answering question are trivial. So, they ask more, inspired each other more.

The method he mentioned, sitting in a lecture, doing problems are assigned make asking question very very hard, which makes people less likely to ask question, which further hinder their will to learn more.

1赞

解决一个问题,应该是满足“量守恒定律”。 :grinning:

搜索是使用自己的能量,提问是用别人的能量。总量是一样的。
再者在提问的时候,如果有多人来回答,会产生能量的额外消耗,浪费能量。

有才O(∩_∩)O

如果只提问不搜索,那搜索引擎还有何存在的价值?

个人鼓励提问,但很不喜欢这样的行为,因为这样大多数时候会显得自私而愚蠢,浪费很多人的宝贵时间。

2赞

我回答的问题比你多一百倍

就事论事的回复,没必要这样怼别人。

我不知道你一百倍是怎么来的,我上论坛的时间确实不多,但拿数据说话。

我相信社区不会鼓励这样的行为,管理员不应该也不会鼓励这样的行为。

对不起,我说的是世界这个平台,我的方法也是。

没说只在论坛里。

不用杠,因为这是无法证明的事情。

别卖弄愚蠢。

您看见我在论坛里提过几个问题呀?

多一百倍?怎么到了排资论辈的时候了?要不来排排这个

毕竟括号都配不平的人,指望他能好好说话也挺困难的 :blush:

你肯定知道我屏蔽你了,凑什么热闹